PFAS and drinking water
Canberra’s water supply catchments contain predominantly conservation and low intensity agricultural land use activities, without industrial activities typically associated with PFAS generation. This puts us in a good starting position for raw water quality.
Despite Canberra’s lower risk profile, Icon Water has for many years been testing for PFAS in its water supply catchments.
The testing limit for PFAS has improved over time and this year we adopted a more sensitive methodology to be able to test for the most prevalent types down to as low as <0.002 micrograms per litre (µg/L).
Test Results
The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG) specify limits for PFOS, PFOA, and PFHxS in drinking water. The current health-based guideline values for PFAS are: The sum of PFOS and PFHxS should not exceed 0.07 micrograms per litre. PFOA should not exceed 0.56 micrograms per litre.
There have been no detections of PFAS in our final drinking water and no results above ADWG limits in our source water in our catchments.
Drinking Water (before and after treatment)
Sample Date |
PFHxS µg/L |
PFOS µg/L |
PFOA µg/L |
Stromlo water treatment plant |
|||
Raw Water (prior to treatment) |
|||
20-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
Final Treated Water (after treatment) |
|||
20-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
5-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
15-Jul-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
8-Jul-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
1-Jul-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
24-Jun-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
17-Jun-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND = no detection of PFAS in the sample.
Sample Date |
PFHxS µg/L |
PFOS µg/L |
PFOA µg/L |
Googong water treatment plant |
|||
Raw Water (prior to treatment) |
|||
08-Oct-24 | ND | ND | ND |
30-Sep-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
23-Sep-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
28-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
Final Treated Water (after treatment) |
|||
08-Oct-24 | ND | ND | ND |
30-Sep-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
23-Sep-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
28-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
Additional testing:
Icon Water also tests for other PFAS chemicals that are not specified in the current ADWG limits. We have had no detections for any of the types of PFAS tested in our final drinking water. This includes PFBS which has been proposed for inclusion in an update to the ADWG.
In 2018, Icon Water also conducted tests of the drinking water in Pialligo due to a higher potential risk given its proximity to the airport where firefighting foams may have been used. There were no detections of PFAS. As an additional precaution, double check valve water meters were installed to provide further network protection.
Source Water
Sample Date |
PFHxS µg/L |
PFOS µg/L |
PFOA µg/L |
Bendora Reservoir |
|||
27-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
12-Jun-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
27-Jun-23 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
16-Jun-22 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
8-Jun-21 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
27-Aug-20 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
19-Dec-16 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
Corin Reservoir |
|||
29-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
13-Jun-24 |
ND |
#0.0008 |
ND |
21-Jun-23 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
20-Jun-22 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
30-Jun-21 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
28-Aug-20 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
24-Feb-17 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
15-Dec-16 |
ND |
*0.02 |
ND |
Cotter Reservoir |
|||
30-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
13-Jun-24 |
ND |
#0.0007 |
ND |
29-Jun-23 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
16-Jun-22 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
2-Jun-21 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
18-Aug-20 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
12-Jan-17 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
Googong Reservoir |
|||
20-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
13-Jun-24 |
ND |
#0.0009 |
ND |
15-Jun-23 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
20-Jun-22 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
7-Jun-21 |
ND |
*0.03 |
ND |
31-Aug-20 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
3-Jan-17 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
Murrumbidgee River (East Side) Pump Station |
|||
29-Aug-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
1-Jul-24 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
23-Jun-23 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
16-Jun-22 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
16-Jun-21 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
18-Aug-20 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
20-Dec-16 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
Note on results:
# Ultra low-level detection results in preliminary testing on 13 June 2024 are indicative of contamination during the test collection process, not in the source water supply. Follow-up tests found no detections. PFAS chemicals are also prevalent in products such as clothing, lids and protection equipment. The near-identical results in early tests across different environments indicated that the source of the PFAS was likely not inherent in the water in those locations and was more likely to be related to the same individual collecting all of the samples in question.
*Result below Australian Drinking Water Guideline limits
FAQs
What is PFAS?
PFAS are a group of human-made chemicals known as per and polyfluoroalkyl substances that have been widely used in industrial and consumer products since the mid-1900s.
While, they have unique physical and chemical properties that make them very good at resisting heat, stains, grease, and water, they are very difficult to destroy and do not easily break down in the environment.
Where does PFAS come from?
PFAS chemicals are not added to Canberra’s drinking water.
PFAS (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are chemicals that are found in hundreds of everyday household and industrial products. This includes some sunscreens, cosmetics, clothing, carpet, non-stick frying pans, paint, dental floss, food packaging, feminine hygiene products and fire-fighting foams.
PFAS is not manufactured in Australia. The Federal Government has also banned the importation of some PFAS chemicals into the country by July 2025 – including everyday products that contain PFAS.
These chemicals are hard to break down and have been found in environments around the world, including locations within Australia.
We maintain relationships with land managers and the community in proximity to our catchments to help protect the source water from these types of contaminants. We also work with the ACT Environment Protection Agency, ACT Health and local industry as part of our water quality management.
Does Icon Water test for PFAS?
We maintain a precautionary approach, staying abreast of the science and testing our source water as early as 2016 and our final treated drinking water in 2024.
Our testing is conducted by an independent, National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) accredited laboratory. The laboratory methodology and instrumentation can currently detect down to the equivalent of one drop in ten Olympic swimming pools worth of water.
What is the difference between ‘Source water’, ‘Raw water’ and ‘Final treated water’?
In Canberra, ‘source water’ is the water in our dams and at our collection location on the Murrumbidgee river. ‘Raw water’ is the water that arrives from the source at our plant before it is treated. ‘Final treated water’ is what is put into the network of pipes that lead to your local reservoir where water is temporarily stored before it is supplied through your water meter. The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines only apply to final treated water supplied for drinking.
Is there PFAS in Canberra's drinking water?
There have been no detections of PFAS in our final treated water at our Stromlo Water Treatment Plant or Googong Water Treatment Plant.
While current testing has not detected PFAS in treated water supplied into the network, we remain vigilant given its global prevalence, and will continue to report testing data to regulators and the community.
Is the water safe to drink?
Yes. Water supplied across Canberra and Queanbeyan is tested for up to 177 parameters. We typically receive over 37,000 test results per year. In 2023-24, 100% of applicable test results were compliant with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG) health values.
The safe amount of PFAS in the ADWG is determined by the independent National Health and Medical Research Council looking at PFAS exposure over your whole life, and not a single day.
Our latest Drinking Water Quality Report can be found here.
Why are there some results for PFAS in source water?
In some of our earlier testing, we had a couple of detections (well below the ADWG limits) that were not detected in subsequent testing.
On 13 June testing of untreated source water (dams and rivers) returned ultra-low results for one type of PFAS in some locations.
The samples taken on this day were collected across several catchments by an individual sample collector. The results, despite the environments being far apart, were essentially identical. This would be a very unusual occurrence in nature. Given how prevalent PFAS is in products such as clothing, lids, and protective equipment, a more likely explanation for the results would be a contamination during collection. Follow-up testing done by the independent laboratory did not detect any PFAS in samples from those catchments. We have further expanded our protocols to take field and testing equipment blanks. We have also updated guidance for sampling which includes not washing hair 24 hours before, not wearing sunscreen or cosmetics and restricting the types of clothing and equipment samplers can use and wear.
Where can I find more information on PFAS
For more information, please visit Water Services Association of Australia website. You can read more about the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines on the NHMRC website.
Is Icon Water able to test down to the new limits proposed in the ADWG?
The current methodology applied by Icon Water’s independent accredited laboratory is already testing to below the proposed new limits. We have had no detections for any type of PFAS chemicals tested in final drinking water including PFBS.
We’re always happy to help
For general enquiries, you can contact us directly at talktous@iconwater.com.au. Our team will do their best to respond within 24 hours.
If you need a bit more assistance, or just prefer talking to a person,
you can call us on (02) 6248 3111 (select option 3).